肿瘤瞭望消化时讯

ESMO ASIA 2024丨黄俊教授团队5项TiP摘要研究闪耀国际舞台

肿瘤瞭望消化时讯

编者按:在2024年欧洲肿瘤内科学会亚洲年会(ESMO ASIA 2024)上中国结直肠癌领域TIP摘要研究共有9个,此前我们已经整理了其中4个(ESMO ASIA 2024丨从徐瑞华教授等中国研究者入选的TiP摘要看结直肠癌最新研发动向),本文将整理剩余的由中山大学附属第六医院黄俊教授团队领衔的5项研究,以飨读者。


摘要号:117TiP

标题:减孔腹腔镜手术治疗结肠和上段直肠癌患者的安全性和有效性:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、Ⅲ期研究

背景

根治性切除术仍是非转移性结直肠癌(CRC)治疗的基石。传统腹腔镜手术往往需要助手参与,而助手技能和经验的不足可能导致意外损伤和干扰手术进程。减孔腹腔镜手术通过简化设置,即外科医生使用两个操作孔,助手使用一个观察孔,使得外科医生能够独立完成手术。这种方法有望减少因助手经验不足而导致的手术时间延长和损伤。此外,减孔腹腔镜手术的切口更少,意味着术后疼痛减轻、恢复更快,同时减少了资源使用和医疗费用。

试验设计

这是一项在中国进行的多中心、开放标签、随机、Ⅲ期平行设计试验。患者通过计算机随机管理系统以1:1的比例随机分配至减孔腹腔镜手术组或传统腹腔镜手术组。减孔腹腔镜手术组采用三个孔进行手术,而传统腹腔镜手术组采用五个孔。本研究是首项评估可切除CRC减孔腹腔镜手术安全性和有效性的前瞻性随机对照试验,旨在评估围手术期并发症、R0切除率以及3年无病生存率和总生存率。主要纳入标准包括术前临床肿瘤分期为Ⅰ~Ⅲ期(cTxNxM0)的CRC、经组织学证实的结直肠腺癌,并且患者有能力提供知情同意。主要排除标准包括其他恶性肿瘤病史、需要紧急手术的并发症、不可切除的淋巴结转移、高ASA分级和/或ECOG评分升高。计划入组500例患者,截至2024年5月5日,已入组128例患者。

临床试验识别号

NCT05953662


摘要号:121TiP 

标题:低位直肠癌Parks术与Bacon吻合术后肛门功能比较:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机对照研究

背景

低位直肠癌(LRC),定义为肿瘤位于齿状线≤3 cm处,在选择既能保留肛门功能又确保肿瘤治疗有效性的手术方式时,面临重大挑战。既往研究表明,Parks术与Bacon术的疾病无复发生存率和总生存率相当。然而,缺乏大规模随机对照试验的直接证据来比较这两种术式对LRC患者术后肛门功能、生活质量、并发症和总生存率的影响。

试验设计

本项在中国开展的前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验旨在填补这一知识空白。符合纳入标准的LRC患者通过计算机随机管理系统以1:1的比例随机分配至Parks术组或Bacon术组。Parks术涉及结肠-肛管吻合术,而Bacon术涉及结肠-肛管拖出吻合术。术后3个月、6个月和1年,通过直肠肛管测压和低前位切除综合征(LARS)评分评估术后肛门功能。同时评估生活质量评分和术后吻合口并发症的发生率。关键纳入标准包括:MRI证实LRC且肿瘤距齿状线≤3 cm,经多学科团队讨论认为适合保肛手术,以及患者能够签署知情同意书。主要排除标准包括其他恶性肿瘤病史、需要立即手术的紧急并发症、不可切除的肿瘤扩展、ASA分级高和/或ECOG评分高。本研究计划入组265例患者,截至2024年5月5日,已入组8例患者。

临床试验识别号

NCT05943444

摘要号:122TiP

标题:DNA错配修复缺陷或微卫星高度不稳定远端直肠癌患者接受PD-1单抗治疗后达到病理完全缓解的“观察等待”策略(BASKET)

背景

PD-1单抗在DNA错配修复缺陷或微卫星高度不稳定(dMMR/MSI-H)CRC中显示出显著疗效。特别是,新辅助免疫治疗在这些患者中显示出有希望的病理完全缓解(pCR)率。然而,远端直肠癌(RC)的根治性切除术可能导致功能损害和心理困扰。对于早期和局部晚期(Ⅰ~Ⅲ期)dMMR/MSI-H远端RC患者,在接受PD-1单抗治疗后达到临床完全缓解(cCR)后,采用“观察等待”策略的可行性和安全性尚不确定。

试验设计

BASKET研究是一项在中国开展的开放标签、多中心、前瞻性Ⅱ期试验。纳入Ⅰ~Ⅲ期dMMR/MSI-H远端RC患者,接受新辅助免疫治疗,即每3周周期的第1天静脉注射200 mg信迪利单抗(PD-1单抗),共6个周期。PD-1单抗治疗后达到cCR的患者被纳入并启动“观察等待”策略。本研究是首次前瞻性评估这些患者中“观察等待”策略的有效性和安全性的研究,有望为远端RC患者的个体化精准治疗提供指导,从而可以保留器官功能并提高患者生活质量。关键纳入标准包括:肿瘤活检经免疫组化(IHC)染色证实为dMMR或经下一代测序证实为MSI-H,MRI确定肿瘤位于腹膜反折以下,临床分期为TxNxM0。cCR通过增强CT/MRI评估,并通过活检确认。主要排除标准包括Ⅳ期远端RC、多发性CRC、活动性自身免疫性疾病和长期使用皮质类固醇。计划入组47例患者,截至2024年5月1日,已入组10例患者,目前研究正在进行中。

临床试验识别号

NCT04643041

摘要号:123TiP

标题:预测局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗反应的动态多组学整合模型

背景

新辅助治疗显著提高了CRC患者的pCR率和预后。pCR率的提高可能与癌胚抗原(CEA)水平降低、肿瘤大小减小、循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)水平降低、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)降低以及磁共振成像(MRI)信号增强相关。准确预测新辅助治疗后的pCR可为局部晚期直肠癌(LACR)患者采用“观察等待”策略提供依据。

试验设计

本项多中心、前瞻性、观察性Ⅱ期临床研究旨在开发和验证一个动态多组学整合模型,用于预测LACR(T3~4NxM0)患者新辅助治疗后的pCR。具体而言,这是首项前瞻性研究,旨在评估该动态多组学模型的预测准确性,并确定其相对于基于单模态成像、病理学或分子生物标志物的传统预测模型的优势。符合条件的患者将被前瞻性纳入,并收集新辅助治疗前、治疗期间和术前MRI扫描、苏木精-伊红(H&E)染色的组织病理学切片、CEA、NLR和ctDNA,并进行标注。将这些特征的变化以及术前多阶段活检结果纳入预测模型,以预测新辅助治疗后个体达到pCR的情况。预测结果将通过切除标本的病理肿瘤反应进行验证。关键纳入标准包括:组织学证实为直肠腺癌,临床分期为T3~4NxM0,且无既往放化疗或结直肠手术史。主要排除标准包括需要长期使用免疫抑制剂的并发症、药物滥用或影响研究参与或评估的社会条件,以及5年内有其他恶性肿瘤病史或术前有盆腔外远处转移的证据。本研究计划入组106例患者。

临床试验识别号

NCT06364371

摘要号:124TiP

标题:局部晚期dMMR/MSI-H型同时多原发性结直肠癌患者接受PD-1单抗联合或不联合 mFOLFOX6 新辅助治疗的安全性和有效性

背景

同步多原发结直肠癌(sMPCC)在临床上较为罕见,但近年来其发病率呈上升趋势。我们之前的研究发现,与单发原发性结直肠癌(SPCRC)患者相比,sMPCC患者中出现dMMR/MSI-H的比例显著更高。在dMMR/MSI-H型SPCRC患者中,PD-1单抗治疗已显示出显著疗效。然而,局部晚期dMMR/MSI-H型sMPCC患者接受新辅助免疫治疗的安全性和有效性仍不确定。

试验设计

本项在中国开展的前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、单臂Ⅱ期研究旨在评估局部晚期dMMR/MSI-H型sMPCC患者接受新辅助免疫治疗的安全性和有效性。患者被分为三种亚型:1型(兼具dMMR/MSI-H和错配修复正常/微卫星稳定(pMMR/MSS)病灶)、2型(所有病灶均为dMMR/MSI-H)、3型(所有病灶均为pMMR/MSS)。本研究纳入1型和2型患者。具有混合MMR状态的患者接受每2周一次、共6个周期的新辅助联合治疗,包括mFOLFOX6和PD-1单抗;而dMMR/MSI-H型患者则在同一周期内接受PD-1单抗新辅助免疫治疗。本项研究是首项针对局部晚期dMMR/MSI-H型sMPCC患者新辅助免疫治疗安全性和有效性的前瞻性研究。预计本研究结果将为sMPCC患者的个性化治疗策略提供指导。关键纳入标准包括sMPCC的组织学确诊、通过免疫组化或下一代测序鉴定为dMMR/MSI-H以及临床分期(cT3~4NxM0)。主要排除标准包括Ⅳ期、5年内患有其他恶性肿瘤、长期暴露于免疫抑制药物以及拒绝提供知情同意。计划入组17例患者。

临床试验识别号

NCT06002789

摘要原文

117TiP - Safety and efficacy of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for patients with colon and upper rectal cancer: A multicenter, prospective, randomized phase III study


Background


Radical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Conventional laparoscopic surgeries often involve assistants whose limited skills and experience may lead to inadvertent injuries and surgeon interference. Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery, with its simplified setup of two operation ports for the surgeon and one observation port for the assistant, allows for independent surgeon completion of the procedure. This approach potentially mitigates prolonged operation times and injuries due to inexperienced assistants. Additionally, reduced-port laparoscopy entails fewer incisions, translating to reduced postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and decreased resource utilization and medical expenses.


Trial design


This multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial with a parallel design is conducted in China. Patients are randomized (1:1) to either the reduced-port laparoscopic surgery group or the conventional laparoscopic surgery group using a computerized randomization management system. The reduced-port laparoscopic surgery group undergoes surgery with three ports, while the conventional laparoscopic surgery group undergoes surgery with five ports. This study represents the first prospective randomized controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for resectable CRC. The study aims to evaluate perioperative complications, R0 resection rates, and 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates. Key inclusion criteria include preoperative clinical tumor stage I-III (cTxNxM0) CRC, histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma, and patient capacity to provide informed consent. Main exclusion criteria comprise a history of other malignant tumors, complications necessitating emergency surgery, non-resectable lymph node metastasis, high ASA grading, and/or elevated ECOG scores. A total of 500 patients are planned for enrollment, with 128 patients enrolled as of May 5th, 2024. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05953662) and ongoing.


Clinical trial identification

NCT05953662.


121TiP - Comparison of postoperative anal function between parks and bacon techniques in lower rectal cancer: A multicenter, prospective, randomized control study


Background


Lower rectal cancer (LRC), defined as tumors located ≤ 3cm from the dentate line, poses challenges in selecting optimal surgical approaches for anal preservation while ensuring oncological outcomes. Previous studies have shown comparable disease-free and overall survival rates between Parks' and Bacon's operations. However, evidence from large-scale randomized controlled trials directly comparing their effects on postoperative anal function, quality of life, complications, and overall survival in LRC patients is lacking.


Trial design


This prospective, multicentric, randomized controlled trial conducted in China aims to address this gap in knowledge. LRC patients meeting inclusion criteria are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the Parks’ operation group or the Bacon’s operation group using a computerized randomization management system. Parks’ operation involves colon anal anastomosis, while Bacon’s operation involves colon anal pull-out anastomosis. Postoperative anal function is assessed using rectoanal manometry and the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score at 3 months, 6 months, and 1year post-surgery. Quality of life scores and the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications are also evaluated. Key inclusion criteria include pathological confirmation of LRC with ≤ 3cm distance from the tumor to the dentate line by MRI, suitability for anal preservation surgery discussed by a multidisciplinary team, and patient ability to provide informed consent. Main exclusion criteria encompass history of other malignancies, emergent complications requiring immediate surgery, unresectable tumor extension, high ASA grading, and/or elevated ECOG scores. The study plans to enroll 265 patients, with 8 patients enrolled as of May 5th, 2024. Registration with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05943444) has been completed.


Clinical trial identification

NCT05943444.


122TiP - Watch and wait in patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high distal rectal cancer accessed pathological complete response after PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy (BASKET)


Background


PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy has demonstrated significant efficacy in DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). Notably, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising pathological complete response (pCR) rates in these patients. However, radical resection in distal rectal cancer (RC) may lead to functional impairments and psychological distress. The feasibility and safety of a watch and wait approach in patients with early stage and locally advanced (stage I-III) dMMR/MSI-H distal RC achieving clinical complete response (cCR) after PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy remain uncertain.


Trial design


The BASKET study is an open-label, multicenter, prospective phase II trial conducted in China. Patients with stage I-III dMMR/MSI-H distal RC received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with 200 mg sintilimab (PD-1 monoclonal antibody) intravenously on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 6 cycles. Patients achieving cCR after PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy were enrolled and initiated a watch and wait approach. This study is the first prospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of watch and wait in these patients. Precise clinical evidence from this study will inform individualized precision treatment for distal RC patients, aiming to preserve organ function and improve quality of life. Key inclusion criteria comprised tumor biopsy confirmed dMMR by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining or MSI-H by next-generation sequencing, MRI-identified tumor located below the peritoneal reflection, and clinical staging TxNxM0. cCR was assessed by enhanced CT/MRI and confirmed by biopsy. Stage IV distal RC, multiple CRC, active autoimmune diseases, and long-term corticosteroid use were among the main exclusion criteria. A total of 47 patients are planned for enrollment. As of May 1, 2024, 10 patients have been enrolled. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04643041) and ongoing.


123TiP - Dynamic multi-omics integration modelto predict neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer


Background


Neoadjuvant therapies have significantly enhanced the pathological complete response (pCR) rates and prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. The increased pCR rates may correlate with reductions in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, tumor size, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and enhanced signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Accurately predicting pCR after neoadjuvant therapy could inform the adoption of a watch and wait strategy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LACR).


Trial design


This multicenter, prospective, observational phase II clinical study aims to develop and validate a dynamic multi-omics integration model for predicting pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in LACR (T3-4NxM0) patients. Specifically, it is the first prospective study to assess the predictive accuracy of this dynamic multi-omics model and determine its superiority over conventional prediction models based on single-modality imaging, pathology, or molecular biomarkers. Eligible patients will be prospectivelyenrolled, and pre-neoadjuvant treatment, during-treatment, and preoperative MRI scans, histopathology slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), CEA, NLR, and ctDNA will be collected and annotated. Changes in these features along with preoperative multistage biopsy results will be incorporated into the prediction model to forecast individual achievement of pCR after neoadjuvant treatment. Predictive results will be validated with pathological tumor response evaluated from resected specimens. Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma, clinical stage T3-4NxM0 and no history of previous chemoradiotherapy or colorectal surgery. Main exclusion criteria encompass complications requiring long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs, substance abuse, or social conditions interfering with study participation or assessment, and history of other malignant tumors within 5 years or evidence of distant metastases outside the pelvis preoperatively. The study aims to enroll 106 patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06364371) and is ongoing.


Clinical trial identification

NCT06364371.


124TiP - Safety and efficacy of PD-1 monoclonal antibody with or without mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant therapy in patients with local advanced deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high synchronous multiple primary colorectal cancer


Background


Synchronous multiple primary colorectal cancer (sMPCC) is a clinically rare entity, but its incidence has been on the rise in recent years. Our previous research revealed a significantly higher incidence of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) in patients with sMPCC compared to those with single primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC). PD-1 monoclonal antibody therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in dMMR/MSI-H SPCRC patients. However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced dMMR/MSI-H sMPCC remain uncertain.


Trial design


This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase II study conducted in China aims to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced dMMR/MSI-H sMPCC. Patients are categorized into three sub-types: type 1, with both dMMR/MSI-H and proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) lesions; type 2, with all lesions exhibiting dMMR/MSI-H; and type 3, with all lesions showing pMMR/MSS. Enrolled patients include those with type 1 and type 2. Patients with mixed MMR status receive neoadjuvant combination therapy comprising mFOLFOX6 and PD-1 monoclonal antibody every 2 weeks for 6 cycles, while patients with dMMR/MSI-H receive neoadjuvant immunotherapy with PD-1 monoclonal antibody in the same cycles. This study represents the first prospective investigation into the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced dMMR/MSI-H sMPCC. The findings of this study are anticipated to inform personalized treatment strategies for sMPCC patients. Key inclusion criteria encompass histological confirmation of sMPCC, immunohistochemical or next-generation sequencing identification of dMMR/MSI-H, and clinical staging (cT3-4NxM0). Main exclusion criteria include stage IV, other malignant tumors within 5 years, long-term exposure to immunosuppressive agents, and refusal to provide informed consent. A total of 17 patients are planned for enrollment.


Clinical trial identification

NCT06002789.