ISDE 2024现场直击丨Andrew Seely教授:预测性生命体征监测助力改善食管癌围手术期患者预后

肿瘤瞭望消化时讯 发表时间:2024-10-17 11:52:50

编者按:2024年9月22~24日,第20届世界食管疾病大会(ISDE)在苏格兰爱丁堡盛大召开。渥太华大学医学院Andrew Seely教授一项关于在食管癌围术期预测生命体征监测的研究入选大会摘要展示(摘要号:S19.05)。《肿瘤瞭望消化时讯》在大会现场针对该研究对Andrew Seely教授进行了专访。

肿瘤瞭望消化时讯:目前用于食管癌围术期预测性生命体征监测的技术有哪些?您能否举一些已经显示出显著获益的例子?

Oncology Frontier: What are the current technologies used for predictive vital sign monitoring peri-esophagectomy, and how effective are they in improving patient outcomes? Can you provide some examples that have demonstrated significant benefits? 

Andrew Seely教授:当前,利用预测监测技术来优化治疗流程尚未有成熟方案问世,但这一领域正迅速崛起,充满了创新的研究、开发与商业化潜力。我们正处于机器学习驱动的预测监测工具应用的起步阶段,这些工具能够整合患者多个生命体征随时间连续监测的数据。举例来说,“Visensia Safety Index”系统就是一个典范,它通过整合全面的生命体征数据,预测患者可能的病情恶化趋势,并实现实时追踪。目前,我们已在渥太华大学对手术患者应用此系统进行效果评估,但尚未有确凿的临床试验数据证实其广泛益处。
展望未来,新技术还将探索心率与呼吸频率变化模式的深度分析,借助机器学习算法,构建预测性临床决策支持系统,旨在提升急诊、重症监护及普通病房患者的护理质量。这标志着对心率变异性及呼吸率变异性分析的创新应用,有助于我们更精准地把握患者状态、预测病情走向及评估恶化风险。
不过,该技术的实施面临一大挑战,即如何获取高质量的连续波形及生命体征数据以支撑精准的预测监测。幸运的是,随着可穿戴监测设备的持续升级与医院数据采集能力的增强,我们正逐步克服这一障碍,为技术的进一步开发与应用铺平道路。我相信这一领域将成为未来几年研究、开发与商业化的热点,有非常广阔的发展前景。

Andrew Seely: There is currently no proven technologies that use predictive monitoring to improve care. It's an area of burgeoning interest and exciting research, development and commercialization. We are at the early stages of applying predictive monitoring tools based on machine learning, where we integrate the information of multiple vital signs measured continuously over time. So, for example, there is a tool called the Visensia Safety Index, which integrates all of the vital signs to provide a prediction of subsequent deterioration, which can then be tracked in real time over time. And we are evaluating that at the University of Ottawa in surgical patients at this time. But there have been no proven clinical trials demonstrating benefit to predictive monitoring. In addition, novel technology for the future includes where we analyze patterns of variation of heart rate and respiratory rate, and then do machine learning on that information to create predictive clinical decision support tools to improve care in the emergency room, the ICU, or even on ward patients. That is an innovative use of heart rate variability and respiratory rate variability analysis in order to derive a better understanding of the patient status, their trajectory and their risk of deterioration. A challenge in this technology is getting access to high quality continuous waveform or continuous vital sign data with which to be to perform predictive monitoring. However, there's been new improvements in wearable monitors, new improvements in being able to access waveform data, data from patients in hospitals, and that is allowing us to develop and apply this technology further. So it's an exciting domain of research, development and commercialization that is going to evolve further in the coming years.

肿瘤瞭望消化时讯:在围手术期,预测性生命体征监测面临的主要挑战是什么?您是如何应对这些挑战?

Oncology Frontier: What are the main challenges associated with predictive vital sign monitoring in the perioperative setting? How do you address these challenges?

Andrew Seely教授:一个核心挑战在于获取持续监测的生命体征数据和波形数据,如心电图或呼气末二氧化碳浓度数据,这些数据是进行预测性分析的基础。尽管如此,正如我前面提到的,这一方面的状况正在逐步改善。
另一个挑战在于,当我们谈论预测信息时,实际上是在为临床医生提供预测性临床决策支持,以帮助他们做出更明智的决策。例如,在重症监护室中,何时为患者撤除呼吸机是一个关键问题。我们有一个名为“撤机助手”的工具,能够优化临床医生判断撤机时机和安全性的能力。然而,挑战在于,临床决策支持需要医生主动利用这些信息,并将其纳入他们的决策过程中。我们目前才开始深入了解医生如何实际利用预测性临床决策支持,以及他们在什么情况下信任或不信任这些预测,这同样是一个需要克服的挑战。

Andrew Seely: Well, a principal challenge is access to continuously monitored vital sign data and or waveform data, such as electrocardiogram or capnography data. So you have to have that data in order to perform predictive analyses on continuously monitored data. So that is one challenge, but as I mentioned, things are improving in that respect. A second challenge is that when everyone talks about predictive information, you are providing that predictive clinical decision support to clinicians such that they can improve a decision that they are making. For example, when to take a patient off a breathing machine in an ICU, we have a tool called extubation advisor that can optimize a clinician's ability to determine the timing and safety of taking a patient off a breathing machine, off a ventilator. But a challenge is that clinical decision support requires a physician to utilize that information and factor it into their decision making. And we are just starting to understand how doctors, in fact, utilize a predictive clinical decision support, how they trust it when they do, when they don't, and so that is a challenge as well.

肿瘤瞭望消化时讯:展望未来,您认为食管癌围术期预测性生命体征监测方面会有哪些进展或创新?这些进展或创新对患者护理和手术效果有哪些影响?

Oncology Frontier: Looking ahead, what advancements or innovations do you foresee in predictive vital sign monitoring for peri-esophagectomy? How might emerging technologies or approaches further enhance patient care and surgical outcomes in the future?

Andrew Seely教授:在食管切除术或任何复杂手术患者的管理中,预测性监测能发挥关键作用,我想重点阐述两个主要方面:

首先,我们可以通过改进术前评估来识别术后不良事件的风险,进而为每位患者制定个性化的靶向治疗方案,以预防特定术后不良事件的发生。例如,相较于为所有患者采用统一的加速康复路径,我们更倾向于采用模块化方法。这意味着,对于术后肺部并发症风险较高的患者,我们会在术前进行如高流量加温加湿给氧、呼吸肌训练等针对性干预,以减少这些并发症的发生。这是一种灵活的、个性化的、风险导向的术后管理方法。

其次,在术后阶段,我们可以利用连续预测性监测来提供不良事件的早期预警,从而改善管理和预防工作。理想情况下,这种监测能够及时发现如吻合口瘘、肺部感染或房颤等风险,并预防这些不良事件或其后果的恶化。这样我们就能更早地干预,更有效地保护患者的健康。

Andrew Seely: So I would highlight two principal areas where predictive monitoring can be useful in the management of esophageal resections or any patient undergoing complex surgery. First, I think that we can utilize better preoperative assessments to identify risks of postoperative adverse events to create targeted pathways that are individualized to help prevent certain post operative adverse events. For example, if instead of having one enhanced recovery pathway for all patients, the concept is that to have a modular approach where patients who are at increased risk for pulmonary complications postoperatively get targeted interventions like high flow, heated humidity, oxygen, or inspiratory muscle training preoperatively, and those things would help prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. So it's a modular, individualized, targeted approach to risk mitigation postoperatively. So that is one. A second, I think, is to use continuous predictive monitoring in the post operative period to provide early warning for adverse events and improved management and prevention, ideally of deterioration secondary to those adverse events. So earlier detection of anastomotic leak ,or pulmonary infection, or atrial risk for atrial arrhythmias, all those things, I think, could help prevent the development of those adverse events or the consequences of those adverse events.

发表评论

提交评论
  • 推荐文章